← Epsom & Ewell Borough Council

Status

Awaiting decision New housing
Received
Not recorded
New homes
110

Summary

Outline application for up to 110 dwellings including affordable homes; access reserved.

Full proposal

Outline application for up to 110 dwellings including affordable homes (all matters reserved except access from Langley Vale Road)

Documents

ACKN
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Additional Thames Water comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Affordable Housing Needs Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Agricultural Land Class
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Application Form - without Personal data
Application Form
Not yet archived · Original link
Arboricultural Impact Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Archaeological Desk Based Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Archaeological Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Biodiversity Impact Calculation
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
CIL Additional Information Form
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Contaminated Land Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
County Highway Authority
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Cover Letter
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Design and Access Statement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Developer Response to Third Party Comments
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Ecological Impact Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Enhanced Sustainable Transport Strategy
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Environment Agency comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Fire Safety Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Flood Risk Assessment Drainage Strategy (Part 1)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Flood Risk Assessment Drainage Strategy (Part 2)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Flood Risk Assessment Drainage Strategy (Part 3)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Flood Risk Assessment Drainage Strategy (Part 4)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Flood Risk Assessment Drainage Strategy (Part 5)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Framework Travel Plan (Part 1) Final
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Framework Travel Plan (Part 2) Final
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Geo-Environmental Desk Study (Part 1)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Geo-Environmental Desk Study (Part 2)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Geo-Environmental Desk Study (Part 3)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Geo-Environmental Desk Study (Part 4)
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Green Belt Statement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
GUAR_E
Planning Notice
Not yet archived · Original link
Heritage Statement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Highways Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Highways Officer comments 2
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Highways Officer comments 2
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Landscape Design Statement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Langley Bottom Farm Energy Assessment
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Langley Vale Action Group
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Langley Vale Action Group Enhanced Transport Strategy
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Langley Vale Action Group Transport Review
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Location Plan
Plans
Not yet archived · Original link
MAJR_E
Site Notice
Not yet archived · Original link
MAJR_E
Site Notice
Not yet archived · Original link
MAJR_E
Site Notice
Not yet archived · Original link
MAJR_E
Site Notice
Not yet archived · Original link
MP Letter
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Natural England comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Neighbour Consultation Letter
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
NEIGHLIST
Neighbour Notification List
Not yet archived · Original link
Objction (Brown)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Anns-Baldock)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Arthurs)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Ball)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Ball)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Baxter)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Beaumont)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Bensley)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Bond)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Bostock 2)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Breen)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Broad)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Brown 1)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Brown 2)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Brown)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Cheetham)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Cheetham)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Clarke)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Cordery)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (CPRE)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Curley)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Curley)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Deacon)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Dunne)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Epsom and Walton Training Grounds)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Hanly)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Hart)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Howden)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Imeson 2)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Imeson 3)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Imeson)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Imeson)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Imeson) 4
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Jockey Club)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Kearsley and Caple)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Langley Vale Action Group)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lavey 2)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lavey 3)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lavey 4)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lavey)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lohn)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Lumley)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Mahler)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Mark Johnson)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Padgett)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Radley)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Redgwell)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Sanders)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Shrimpton 2)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Shrimpton 3)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Shrimpton 4)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Shrimpton)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Tiller)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Unadkat)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (West Surrey Badger Group)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection (Workman)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Parameters Plan
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Planning Statement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Proposed Site Access Arrangement
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Reigate and Banstead Response
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Representation (Councillor Kim Spickett)
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
SCC Highways Comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Statement of Community Involvement Final
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Strategic Housing comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
SuDS Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Thames Water comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Transport Assessment (Part 1) Final
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Transport Assessment (Part 2) Final
Supporting Information
Not yet archived · Original link
Waste Officer comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link
Woodland Trust comments
Consultation response
Not yet archived · Original link

Have your say

Your comment matters. Councils must consider every representation that raises material planning considerations.

Write a comment