← London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

24/2406/LBC

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Status

Application Refused House extension
Received
24 Sep 2024
New homes
0

Full proposal

Demolition of 2 storey rear extension with balcony platform and steps. Demolition of existing front steps that lead from driveway to garden level. Proposed single storey rear extension with terrace over. Proposed front lightwell (where the existing steps from driveway to garden level are located) with windows at garden level, new helical steps from the driveway and associated alterations. Internal reconfiguration/additions.

Documents

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION
Application Form
Not yet archived · Original link
BASEMENT SCREENING ASSESSMENT_SCH 2
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
CIL FORM
Application Form
Not yet archived · Original link
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS_REGISTER_SC2
Drawing Number Register
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN22.15.103 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS22.15.150 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING GARDEN LEVEL PLAN22.15.100 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING LOWER GROUND FLOOR PLAN22.15.101 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN22.15.104 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING SECTION AA22.15.160 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING SECTION BB22.15.161 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING SITE BLOCK PLAN22.15.SEPT24.050 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
EXISTING UPPER GROUND FLOOR PLAN22.15.102 REV.02
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
FIRE STRATEGY REPORT_SC2
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT - 59 PETERSHAM ROAD REAR EXTENSION_STM
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT - 59 PETERSHAM ROAD_FRONT LIGHTWELL_STM
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT COVER LETTER
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT_59 PETERSHAM RD_SC2
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
Officer Report
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED DEMOLITION PLAN22.15.SEPT24.DEMO REV.00
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.250 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.203 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED GARDEN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.200 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED LIGHTWELL DETAILS22.15.SEPT24.LW REV.00
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED LOWER GROUND FLOOR PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.201 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.204 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED SECTION AA_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.260 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED SECTION BB_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.261 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED SHOWER ROOMS AND ASSOCIATED GLAZING22.15.SEPT24.SANITARY REV.00
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED SITE BLOCK PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.060 REV.00
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED TRAINING OF WISTERIA.22.15.SEPT24.SC2.WIST REV.00
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
PROPOSED UPPER GROUND FLOOR PLAN_SC222.15.SEPT24.SC2.202 REV.01
Submitted Drawing
Not yet archived · Original link
REFUSED
Decision
Not yet archived · Original link
ROOM BY ROOM SCHEDULE OF WORKS
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
Submitted Drawing
Archived · Original link
STRUCTURAL IMPACT REPORT SCH2
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
VERSION 2 LBC STATEMENT
Report
Not yet archived · Original link
VERSION 2 PLANNING STATEMENT
Report
Not yet archived · Original link

Have your say

Your comment matters. Councils must consider every representation that raises material planning considerations.

Write a comment