← Surrey Heath Borough Council

Status

Decided New housing
Received
06 Feb 2025
New homes
5

Summary

Permission in principle for up to five self‑build dwellings west of 35 Mincing Lane.

Full proposal

Permission in Principle for the development of land to the west of 35 Mincing Lane Chobham for up to 5 Self-Build dwellings

Documents

APPEAL DECISION APPENDICES
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Application Form
Application Form
Not yet archived · Original link
ARBORICULTURAL OFFICER COMMENT
Consultee Response
Not yet archived · Original link
CASE FOR SELF BUILD
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
CHOBHAM PARISH COUNCIL
Consultee Response
Not yet archived · Original link
CHOBHAM PARISH COUNCIL
Consultee Response
Not yet archived · Original link
COVERING EMAIL
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
COVERING LETTER
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
Decision
Decision
Not yet archived · Original link
DRAINAGE ENGINEER COMMENT
Consultee Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
LOCATION PLAN
Plans
Not yet archived · Original link
NATURAL ENGLAND
Consultee Response
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
OBJECTION LETTER
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
OBJECTION LETTER
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
OBJECTION LETTER
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Objection Letter
Objection Letter
Not yet archived · Original link
Officer's Report
Officer's Report
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
ONLINE COMMENT(FULL)
Public Comment
Not yet archived · Original link
PLANNING STATEMENT
Correspondence
Not yet archived · Original link
SCC HIGHWAYS
Consultee Response
Not yet archived · Original link

Have your say

Your comment matters. Councils must consider every representation that raises material planning considerations.

Write a comment